Today's Choice Life | Mar. 15th, 2010

Dual Agency, Not In Anyone’s Best Interest

image: 

It seems as though every time I post my professional opinion either in my own personal blog or in a public forum about how I feel about dual agency, a bunch of Realtors jump all over me because they just can’t understand how a Realtor can have such an opinion.

The problem is that most Realtors do not actually understand what dual agency really is or the consequences thereof.

Dual agency is very complicated so it is easy to see how most Realtors wouldn’t understand it however due to their lack of understanding, it hurts consumers.

I wanted to explain what dual agency is and why I do not practice it.

Dual agency occurs when a Realtor represents both parties. Further, since Realtors do not own their listings and the Broker does, the entire office then becomes a dual agent. So, are you confused yet? Obviously, you are not alone because most Realtors don’t even understand.

I will try to break it down for you. Each real estate office must have a Broker of Record who is responsible for all of the agents. So, when one of the Broker’s agent’s takes a new listing, even though the agent met with the sellers and was hired by the sellers, it’s actually the Broker of Record who owns that listing. Are you still with me?

Upon taking that listing, the entire office in effect becomes a dual agent. A dual agent in name only. Think of it as an umbrella. Some Realtors will argue that what one Realtor knows in the office every Realtor knows in the office. Meaning that the agent who took the listing came back and shared all of the seller’s personal and confidential information with every single agent in the office. Not only is that not true but if it were true, that would be unethical on the listing agent’s part because they have a fiduciary duty to their seller to keep the seller’s information confidential. And in an office where there are 200 plus agents that would just be silly to think. How am I doing?

So, yes in theory and in name only, every single agent in that office is deemed a “dual agent” because the Broker of Record owns every single listing in the office. So, if a buyer wants to purchase a listing that belongs to their buyer agent’s office, the agent’s must disclose that dual agency exists within the entire office but neither agent is personally acting as a dual agent.

Are you dizzy yet?

Real dual agency occurs when a Realtor is hired by a seller to sell their home and then secures a buyer who wants to buy that seller’s home and wants the Realtor who took the listing to also represent the buyer at the same time. At that point, the Realtor is working both sides of the table and now can no longer negotiate for either side but instead acts as a mediator. Dual agency.

In my professional opinion, dual agency is not in anyone’s best interest, not even the Realtor. The seller doesn’t have fair representation anymore even though when the listing agent was hired, promised to get the seller the highest price the market would allow and vowed to protect their best interest but as soon as a buyer comes along, the agent just throws all of that out the window and wants to represent a buyer who never wants to pay the highest price for the home.

Years ago, buyers didn’t have the right to representation, only the seller was represented. The playing field was not level. Now, the field is level. Both sides can have equal representation.

I do not see any good in dual agency. I feel that nobody wins when both sides are represented by the same Realtor as someone usually gets hurt. I will certainly not promote it and will stand up against it when the need arises.

Consumers are always concerned about their rights and I write this blog to make consumers aware that they do have rights. They have the right to be represented by their own Realtor. They have the right to have someone look out for their best interests. But most importantly, they have the right, finally, so why not use that right?

ShareThis
Your rating: None Average: 4.2 (5 votes)

Comments

More About Designated Dual Agency

You started to flesh out the concept of the most common form of dual agency...where the transaction involves two separate licensees from the same firm. (The situation of one licensee ending up "representing" both the buyer and the seller is pretty rare.)

Here's some more information on the more common concept...and some other interesting points, too.

http://www.true-agent.com/HomebuyerDefenseGuide.pdf

It's secret number two that addresses Designated Dual Agency...the Realtor created statutes that, in the places where it has been implemented--destroyed the hundreds of years worth of legal protections which existed under the common law of agency, in favor of laws which mostly benefitted real estate salespeople.

These Realtor-created Designated Agency laws, due to the fact that they encourage dealmaking and eliminate the recourse that principals had against malfeasing agents under the common law, very likely are a large part of the reason why the American real estate system broke down.

Jay Reifert, Broker/Owner
Excel-Exclusive Buyer Agency
Madison, Wisconsin

http://www.madison-real-estate.com

hazards of dual agency - Maryland home buyer is shafted

I support Ms. Porsia's stand against dual agency. In 2005 I was victimized by a "presumed buyers agent" working for Weichert Realty of Maryland who switched roles to become a sellers agent without my informed consent. As a result i lost my escrow money as well as considerable legal fees in a vain attempt to validate my legitimate right to fair and competent representation in the housing market. My case is no random aberration but typical of the experience of countless home buyers and sellers who suffer because of the real estate cartel's deceptive practices such as dual agency and affiliated business arrangements.
To learn more about more lawsuit agaisnt Weichert and its ramifications for consumer rights in the housing market, go to Google and type in my name "Joel Stern", then "Weichert"; you'll find numerous blogs and websites that cover this matter.

A way to not exclude the "would be Dual Agents", & 2 reasons.

Lets say that I work for the one big firm in town, for which work 50 of the 100 licensed agents in town.. I take a new "listing".

To ban all 50 from bringing buyers to the table may reduce the "pool" so much that the value diminishes.

What I think is a reasonable path, in this case: Let the other 49 agents bring in buyers, but they would act only as a facilitator, and would take less than half the usual commission, with the saving reverting to the seller. I would have my buyer sign a "Proviso" that would state all the things that the "facilitator" could NOT do
for the buyer: Give advice on value, advice on the details of the seller's reason for selling, etc. The facilitator would create the offer at the price and terms chosen by the buyer, based largely on the MLS database of "Solds and Availables".

This Middle Ground Approach keeps the buyer pool fully stocked, saves the seller money, and lets the listing agent's co-workers not be tied and gagged, while constraining their ability to talk.

The seller would also have to approve the involvement of the co-agents as facilitator... If they did not, then the buyers would either buy something else,
or "fly solo", or hire some outside agent.

jack barry
San Francisco
http://barryhillrealtors.com

dual agency..

note to Editor.:

I intend that my email, just sent a few minutes ago...be published.

I could not tell wheth to hit Save or Preview..

jb

Dual Agency

I made an offer on a house located in one state, where the seller was represented by a Realtor in a neighboring state. This Realtor was licensed in both states, states which have clearly defined differences in the law as spelled out in statutes. The Realtor suggested dual agency, that he would handle all the paperwork, it would be quick and simple. He put forth a standard disclosure stating the nature of the agency and away we went. Prior to closing, and after having put a substantial amount of money into an escrow account, the home was heavily damaged by a tornado. Standard language in the Purchase and Sale Agreement concerning acts of God clearly stated either Buyer or Seller could get out of the contract with all escrow monies being returned to the Buyer. The Realtor refused to return escrow monies and instigated a civil action with the Seller as a co-plaintiff who was claiming breach of contract. I would discover that 10 days after signing the P+S the Realtor and Seller signed a Property Management agreement. Its a mess, standard agreements from one state were intermixed with contracts from the other, addendums to completely different types of transactions were used, the plaintiffs attorney was in the judge's wedding, this same judge found me in contempt of court for failing to be deposed in a timely manner. My attorney actually commited suicide 3 days before the deposition date. The judge gave me the "death penalty" and gave a default judgement to the plaintiffs. I then hire another attorney who gets the judge to reconsider but my escrow monies which the judge ordered to be given to the plaintiffs was not ordered to be returned. This was in the state that the house was located in. I intially retained an attorney and filed a lawsuit in the other state because the language in the contract clearly stated if there was any disputes that state's laws would prevail in a venue located in that state! Talk about a disaster, dual agency in dual states, with a Realtor who was either the dumbest yahoo ever to be licensed or the greediest. The story continues and I'm out 5 figures in escrow monies and lawyer fees, not to mention having my resources tied up keeping me from buying another home. Bahhhhhh Humbug!

© Liberalati LLC RSS / Widgets | Editorial Guidelines
Home | About Us | Advertising Information | Privacy Policy | Employment
Please read our privacy policy. By using this site, you accept our Terms of Service