Scientists have discovered a strategy that photosynthetic organisms use to protect themselves from the dangers of excessive light.
The finding provides further insight into photosynthesis and opens up new avenues for engineering this process, which underlies the global food chain.
The photosynthetic bacterium Chlorobaculum tepidum thrives in the oxygen-free depths or sediments of lakes. In fact, oxygen can poison it by damaging its sensitive reaction center, which converts the energy of light into chemical energy. To survive, the bacterium must have a finely tuned response to light and oxygen that can be turned up or down as needed.
This “photosynthetic volume control” allows the bacterium to survive exposure to oxygen, when light could otherwise harm it.
Robert Blankenship, professor in biology and chemistry at Washington University in St. Louis, whose research team discovered this novel mechanism, thinks that the new insight could help scientists engineer other green organisms to also tolerate oxygen or provide them with additional ways to dissipate unwanted energy.
Chlorobaculum is adapted to life in the smelly sulfurous ooze of lake-bottom muds where there is little or no oxygen. If it is exposed to oxygen, the bacterium must have a way to shut off photosynthesis by shunting energy away from its reaction center—the heart of photosynthesis where light energy is converted into molecular energy the cell can use.
The amount of energy hitting the reaction center is controlled by extensive “antenna complexes.” These huge networks of protein and chlorophyll funnel energy into the reaction center, like the large arrays of mirrors that concentrate sunlight at a single point in solar towers.
Plants and other photosynthetic organisms typically rely on extra pigments, such as orange carotenoids, to safely absorb and disperse excess energy, thus acting as a sort of molecular sunscreen. This process is called quenching, and, for more than 20 years, scientists had known that the antenna protein FMO within Chlorobaculum could quench, but that it did so without carotenoids or other known protections. They had no idea how it did this.
Researchers proposed that rare modifications of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, might account for FMO’s quenching ability, but had no way of testing this idea.
“It was really a mystery for a long time,” Blankenship says. “We knew it was a big effect. But there was no way we could figure out how it actually worked.”
How they figured it out
The mystery remained unsolved until advances in protein mass spectrometry allowed Gregory Orf, a postdoctoral scholar then in the Blankenship lab and now at Arizona State University, to accurately probe the amino acids deep inside the FMO protein.
There, Orf found not the complex, modified amino acids that scientists suspected would account for quenching, but simply two normal cysteines, one of the 20 standard amino acids.
“I noticed that the only amino acids that had any significant difference in reactivity with and without oxygen were these two cysteines, and they’re the only two cysteines in the whole protein,” Orf says.
The cysteines were next to the two chlorophylls closest to the reaction center, a good location for a photosynthetic on/off switch.
The researchers found that if they modified these cysteines so that they were unable to respond to oxygen, or substituted less-active amino acids for them, the quenching effect disappeared. Each cysteine contributed its own effect, but they also acted cooperatively, producing a quenching response greater than the sum of its parts.
“We think that when oxygen is around, cysteine can steal an excited electron from its nearby chlorophyll to release that light energy in the form of harmless heat,” Orf says.
This cysteine-based quenching mechanism, which is new to the field, may offer a way to elegantly engineer oxygen tolerance into other photosynthetic organisms, such as biofuel-producing algae, or into “artificial” photosynthetic systems.
“That’s the importance of this work, I think–other than trying to understand how this one photosynthetic bacterium works,” Blankenship says.
“This fairly simple mechanism for turning energy transfer on and off could be engineered into several different systems.”
The findings appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
All the work, except for EPR spectroscopy, was supported as part of the Photosynthetic Antenna Research Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. The National Science Foundation supported the purchase of the EPR machine.